跳至主要内容

China's real estate(1)

 I would like to discuss China's real estate, but I don't want to rely solely on official data because China's official data has always lacked transparency, and the government strictly cracks down on third-party research organizations. Not to mention that in the past few years, almost all foreign auditing firms have been expelled from China. Today, let's talk about what's really happening in China's real estate market, or more precisely, what China is going through, based on the experiences of people around me.

First, let's clarify some basic realities that many foreigners (those living outside of China) may not be aware of. First, all land in China is state-owned; there is no private land ownership in China. Whether it's a developer wanting to build houses or an individual wanting to build a house, they must purchase land from the government or apply to the local government. It's almost impossible for individuals to build houses in urban areas; generally, individual houses are located in rural or economically underdeveloped regions. Most of the time, these houses are built on land that was transferred from collectively owned farmland to individual residential land after the 1980s. In this land market, the government is the sole supplier. Moreover, since the reforms initiated by the Chinese Communist Party in 1978, government officials rotate positions, meaning local officials cannot stay in one place for too long. Every few years (typically 3-5 years), they must move to another location, either at the same level or for a promotion or demotion. This rotation is designed to prevent the formation of local power cliques. Each central government official also works in different locations before taking up their current position, building networks along the way. An official's performance during their tenure is a significant factor in their promotion or demotion, and this performance assessment is controlled by higher-level officials and accumulates upward. County-level achievements are reported to the city, and the city compiles them to calculate its own achievements. Metrics like per capita income, employment rates, and children's enrollment rates can be manipulated, but attracting investment and infrastructure development involve tangible assets. Furthermore, officials never know how long they will stay in one place, so they naturally strive for larger and more impressive achievements. After all, they will be gone in a couple of years, and the mess left behind won't be their concern. So, in the 1980s, when the government began loosening regulations on private enterprises, the real estate market took off.

The key is that during an official's tenure, all land is state-owned, which means it's under their control. They decide who gets the land and for how much. Developing infrastructure and real estate not only yields enormous profits that can last for generations but also leads to more political achievements and greater chances of promotion. Can you guess who can resist such temptations?

In European countries, the United States, and most democratic nations, land is mostly privately owned. In land transactions and housing construction, the government acts as an intermediary, taxing each transaction. This is not related to the interests of officials. In China, within this hierarchical system where everything flows upward, controlling land represents not only enormous financial interests but also power and promotion opportunities.

Leaving aside these opportunistic behaviors, let's look at China's real estate market today in the context of the official data released in 2020. Land costs account for 43.8% of housing prices. In other words, in the expenses incurred by Chinese people when buying a house, the money directly paid to the government, including land costs (43.8%), deed tax (3.7%), and value-added tax (11%), adds up to 58.5%. Keep in mind that this is the money the government officially records as its revenue.

Moreover, don't forget that the Chinese government doesn't sell land; it only leases it. The 43.8% of the house price only grants the right to use the land for 50-70 years. What happens after that is something the government has not clarified.

When we understand all these factors, it becomes much easier to grasp the current state of China's real estate market.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

My childhood

"Each person's life is like a book; some people prefer to savor it slowly, while others like to gradually forget it. Looking back, I want to see if I can discern the trajectory of the world from my seemingly insignificant life. I am a child from the countryside, and perhaps most people cannot understand what my so-called countryside looks like. Indeed, the impressions of the countryside can be very different depending on the country, and moreover, more than 40 years have passed, during these 40 years of rapid development in China. A phrase suddenly comes to mind, 'I see him building tall buildings, I see him feasting, I see everything collapsing.' The place where I was born is a small town in the southwest of China, a town so small that it only has one street, and the widest part is only 3 meters. Paved with stone slabs, worn by many years of use, the slabs are not flat but rather filled with small bumps and hollows, yet strangely smooth. At the end of the street is a ...

对于GFW的看法

谈到这个问题的人很多,讲的也非常详细,但我窃以为大多数人对此都不够重视。在这一点上来讲,国民党堪称楷模,我想台湾能有今日,很大程度上是因为他们最终也没有建立一个可以堪比中国的新闻审查制度。从权利集中的角度来讲,中国共产党并不比任何一个封建王朝差,从执行力度上来讲,那也和历史上最严酷的王朝可以评分秋色。至少,国民党还是讲点道德,尊重文化的。 如果说计划生育阉割了中国人的人口,那么GFW,和新闻出版署以及文化部阉割了中国人的精神。也许乐观的人说我们总可以翻墙,我们总可以通过这样那样的方法来获得信息。但是悲观的我并不这么认为,这种限制创造的是一种环境,是空气,你固然可以戴着口罩,但是你永远无法自由的呼吸,当大家都在这样的空气中活着的时候,戴着口罩的你是会被人另眼相看的。其实群体意识在掌握了所有媒体的政府面前就是一个面团,想怎么捏就怎么捏,本来就是信息不对称的更何况还是受到随意控制的。这是无解的,中国亟待提高公民意识,哲学思想,文化水平,等等,政府做的不过是又一轮的愚民罢了。鲁迅先生为之殚精极虑,奋斗一生的东西,过了一个世纪依然没有什么本质的改变,阿Q在国人里占的比例是在太大了。就好比是我以诚待国人,以心侍之,以身献之,奈何国人谓之以“傻逼”。你却又待何如?这样的文化封锁,信息封锁导致的唯一结果就是,你振臂一呼之时,便是阿Q们结队去看你被看头之日。 其实,中国政府早已脱离了共产主义这个哲学思想了。换句话说,这个哲学思想本身是没什么对错的,只是一旦应用起来就满不是那么回事了,几乎可以说,共产主义的集权必然导致共产主义的被抛弃。

chrome extension Error: attempting to use a disconnected prot object

if you get this error: Port error: Could not establish connection. Receiving end does not exist. miscellaneous_bindings:236 chromeHidden.Port.dispatchOnDisconnect miscellaneous_bindings:236 Uncaught Error: Attempting to use a disconnected port object miscellaneous_bindings:58 PortImpl.postMessage miscellaneous_bindings:58 responseCallback miscellaneous_bindings:143 xhr.onreadystatechange That means you have make some mistake as this discussed: This is caused when a connection get closed. For example if you open a tab that has the content_script injected, it opens a connection, the tab is closed, and then the background_page tries to pass a message. It will fail because the tab is no longer active to receive the message. In your case I would guess that as tabs close and new tabs open you are attempting to post messages with the old tabId instead of creating a new connection to the new tab. I would recommend reading through the  long-lived connectio...